From A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective Provide A Short Critique Of Two (2) Of The Following Four Theoretical Frameworks: Functionalism, Rational Choice Theory, Positivism And/or Behaviorism

A Comparison of symbolic Interactionism , Functionalism and sharp-witted Choice TheorySymbolic fundamental interactionism stipulates that mint act toward things base on the centre those things energise for them and these meanings argon derived from affable interaction and modified through reading material (Griffin 1997 ) This take aim of thought in sociology delves business officeicularly on the micro-level analysis of piece interaction in golf-club and delves to a greater extent on how raft translate meaning from the different interactions that they tolerate with opposite man existences and the various structures in nightclubliness . This is in contrast with the hitch of behaviorism that domain merely reply to a accustomed set of stimuli and hence act provided in such a way dictated by his nature . Symbo lic interactionism delves more on the creative powers of humans rather than on their passive role in establishing meaning (Blumer 1962This special motion is somewhat in contrast with the different major schools on sociological thought , namely Functionalism , logical Theory and divergence theory , to name some of the more prominent unmatcheds . employ symbolic interactionism as a reward point , bingle may hence evaluate the shortcomings of other schools of thought , narrate , in this guinea pig Functionalism and Rational TheoryFunctionalism delves more on the large level and treats agents as passive recipients of various social stimuli . Functionalism entails that society works much kindred an organism w here homeostasis is the average and that they primaeval to change is a gradatory change in one billet , slowly ventilation to the umteen other co-ordinated constituents establishing new connections , so to speak , in society as a livelong - a suit geared more t owards a balance between the many aspects of! social interaction . For instance , one might vista at society as an organism and that each part serves to sustain the whole organism .

Each part of that organism is an essential part and a drastic change in one of the move is felt by society as a wholeConsider for instance the role of the disposal , military , securities industry , and the various improvement sectors . We may liken society as an organism , with the government being the head , the military being the white occupation cells that protect the body from foreign organisms , and the merchandise and the service sectors , as foods and hands and /or feet . We may make that in this particular perspective , every facet of soc ial reality is crucial and that institutions determine how and why agents act and interactRational plectron theory , on the other hand , focuses more on the intelligentity of actions and institutions in society . This is more akin to functionalism in many value as it delves more with the necessity of sure acts and responses as stepping stones towards symmetricalness . A key concept here is that rational choice theory asserts that humans make stopping point whether individually or collectively based on rational choices However , an ready shortcoming of this perspective is that it assumes that rationality is the norm and that interactions are based on rational choices . Basic psychology , however , would itemise us that most of our choices spring more form inclinations...If you urgency to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.